By Ariel Ky, May 29, 2018
The world’s media is condemning Israeli soldiers who killed
unarmed Palestinians on April 20, 2018 in the Great March of Return in Gaza.
This action coincides with the relocation of the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem.
The uproar in the international community has only begun, as
the plight of the Palestinians, who live in a de facto prison run by Israel,
has come into sharp focus with these actions, and social media has put the
conflict under a magnifying lens.
In Brussels, 4497 pairs of shoes (representing Palestinians
killed by Israelis in the last decade.) were laid out on the square outside the
EU Foreign Affairs Council as ministers are meeting to discuss their response
to the recent massacre of unarmed Palestinian protestors.
In a video posted in The Irish Post, May 25, Irish shoppers quickly
acted to remove Israeli products from shelves in a boycott action.
However, Israel continues unabated in its persecution of
Palestinians. On May 27, as reported in B’Tselem, an entire Palestinian
community of 32 families, Kan Al-Ahmar, is being forcibly transferred from
their West Bank homes.
It was in defense of such a Palestinian neighborhood that
American Rachel Corrie (a 23-year-old peace activist with the International
Solidarity Movement, was killed on March 16, 2003, by an Israeli soldier
operating a bulldozer to demolish the home of a Palestinian pharmacist. She had
courageously stood in front of the home to stop the bulldozer, but lost her
life instead.
“These deaths are
preventable. They are us. We are them,” Rachel Corrie said in a speech as a
young girl.
(Demolishing civilian homes violates Articles 2 and 25 of
the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Articles 33, 53, and 54 of the
Fourth Geneva Conventions.)
For the most part, the international community has
shamefully ignored the plight of Palestinians, and the ongoing genocidal war of
Israel against them. It only came out 14 years later after Arafat’s death in
2004, that he had been assassinated, poisoned with polonium (probably by the
Mossad). The United States has supported Israel with financial aid and military
aid. International businesses have profited from the occupation of
Palestinians.
The United Nations Human Rights Council is considering a
report, “Who Else Profits” which blacklists Israel and the international
businesses that have played a crucial role supporting occupation and
settlement, deeming it a criminal business activity violating human rights.
In March of this year, Trump cut off humanitarian aid (more
than half of $65,000,000 pledged for aid to Palestinian refugees through the
United Nations Relief and Welfare Agency (UNRWA). He demanded that the
Palestinians stop sending payments to Palestinians in Israeli prisons, and to
the families of those who had died.
The U.S. Congress is split on passing a law against
antisemitism, a law which would jail Americans for 20 years for the crime of
criticizing Israel. Anyone criticizing Israel’s war against Palestine gets
accused of antisemitism, which I consider a red herring to deflect
accountability for murder. Just because Jews have been persecuted, doesn’t make
their persecution of Palestinians acceptable. Persecution is persecution. It’s
always wrong.
If the U.S. Congress passes such a law, it should be
immediately struck down as being unconstitutional, as it is a huge move against
freedom of speech.
Today, May 29, 2018 the Israeli Navy stopped a Palestinian
flotilla attempting to sail from Gaza to Cypress. 22 Palestinians were
arrested, including Palestinian patients and students. This was an act of
desperation as some Palestinians do not have access to needed medical care.
Not everyone in the international community has looked the
other way. Two previous freedom flotillas were launched to assist the
Palestinians. On May 31, 2010 a flotilla of international peace activists
sailed from Turkey for the Gaza strip. Israeli’s navy troops intercepted the
six ships, five of which surrendered without incident, but nine of the
activists on the sixth ship were killed when they were boarded. At the time,
Turkey branded Israel a terrorist state.
A second flotilla was intercepted October 5, 2016, 35 nautical
miles off the coast of Gaza. International women activists, including Nobel
Peace prize winner Mairead Maguir of Northern Ireland, were arrested.
The Israelis launched Operation Protective Edge against the
Gaza Strip in 2014, killing over 2,000 Palestinians, including over 50
children. That Israel suffered little or no consequences to these actions has
given Palestinians a sense that Israeli soldiers act with impunity.
Following are excerpts from Noam Chomsky’s 2005 book, Middle East Illusions, as he describes
the history of the conflict, and possible outcomes.
“The participants in the Palestine tragedy of the past half
century perceive it as a national conflict: Jews against Arabs.”
“Sooner or later, at some moment the international situation
will be unfavorable. That moment, if it arrives, will be the end of Israel,
though the catastrophe will be far greater in scale.”
“The Palestinians have suffered a severe historical
injustice in that they have been deprived of a substantial part of their
traditional home.”
Chomsky explains how this impasse cannot be resolved through
the use of force (see Chapter 2, “A Radical Perspective”. He set forth two
alternatives, “The first is the continuation of the national struggle between
Jews and Palestinian Arabs, both sides locked into the losing strategy that I
have already discussed. This will lead either to the physical destruction of
the Palestinians, or to a much wider—probably nuclear—war, with unpredictable
consequences…
The only other alternative… is the establishment of a Palestinian
state in the currently occupied areas. He adds, “I suspect that only extreme
pressure from the great powers could lead Israel to accept a truly independent
Palestinian state.”
Chomsky describes a third way, one which embraces social
change brought about by local forces in both societies, a movement in which
people no longer identified themselves as Jews or Arabs, but people committed
in a common effort to achieve social justice, freedom, and brotherhood.
I would add that women must play a key role in the peace
process, and that brotherhood is an archaic word that does not include women.
This social justice and freedom must include women, and perhaps good will for
the human family is a better term than brotherhood.
A long-range process of transition to a peaceful society
requires an armistice and agreement to no longer use violence to achieve their
goals. What is required is the grace that comes from women’s involvement in
changing to a way of life that allows everyone involved (Israelis and
Palestinians) to thrive.
No comments:
Post a Comment