Forming a Media Working Group for World Peace Movement

World Peace Now (Facebook closed group created by Jah Fe)

Ariel Ky

September 18 at 9:57 AM

Does the world peace movement have a voice and visible presence in the world, Jah Fe? That is something to consider. Perhaps some kind of media committee that issues statements to the world press. I don't think anything like that exists today. Getting the truth out about false flag events to start wars is a powerful way to diffuse the energy field that builds for a military attack.

It was not Iran that attacked the Saudi oil fields. It was the Houthis in Yemen. Believe them when they take credit.

Here is a good video that goes extensively into the situation, giving background on the war with Yemen. Ryan Christian calls it a U.S. led coalition, but I don't think that's accurate. It's a Saudi-led coalition with U.A.E., supported by the U.S., but that's a minor quiblle. The U.S. is in cahoots with the Saudis to kill Yemenis, there is no doubt about that. More war crimes. And crazy rhetoric about attacking Iran, and killing more people.

https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/daily-wrap-up/trump-backs-down-walks-back-locked-loaded-after-iran-narrative-crumbles-pompeo-should-go-next/?unapproved=103927&moderation-hash=2c591e5a8491d77574d47bc5c4f1771c#comment-103927

Jah Fe Excellent idea Ariel. We could have a Media Working Group and a list of international media outlets to send Media Releases to. WOuld you like to be part of that? Anyone else?

 Ariel Ky Yes, I believe that I would like to serve in this way. It's something I often engage in anyways whenever I feel the need to get the truth out to prevent the outbreak of a hot war. However, what I usually do is send an article to English press in countries that are most impacted by an event. For example, when the Cheonan exploded during live fire war games in South Korea, the U.S. was ready to attack North Korea, and blamed them for what was actually a tragic accident. I had been following the war games because tensions were running high at the time, but the corporate media failed to contextualize this event in light of the war games. They just weren't mentioned. Another sign that an event might be a false flag pretext for war is when several different accounts of what happened are floated in rapid succession.

So in the case of the Cheonan, I worked closely with a professor whose expertise was in the history of Korea, and we sorted out between the two of us what was really happening there. It was definitely NOT an attack by North Korea, and there was no reason at all to attack them.

Then I submittted an article to the Mainichi Times in Japan (where I've been published before) and China Daily, where I've also had opinion pieces published. I didn't really expect my articles to get published because of the highly volatile situation.

Nonetheless, I knew that if I got the facts to those newspapers, that they would be shown to people in the government, and could shift perceptions of what happened, and what was an appropriate response. The truth, in my experience, rings so loud, that people know it when they encounter it.

The war against Iraq was perhaps the last time that the energy field for war was greater than all the efforts of millions, really, around the world who endeavored to prevent it. That disastrous war has compelled many people to continue to monitor the world situation, and use the power of prayer and meditation to still the waters. That creates a potent field of energy for different outcomes, and is not to be discounted. However, writers, activists, people willing to demonstrate and go on record, have tremendous impact and do make a difference in the direction humanity is headed.

So I believe that we can deflate the field of energy which builds before a war that makes it happen. There are three ways to do this: 1) with the power of the word in getting out the truth. The truth sets us free. I strongly believe that, 2) with collective action in street protests and demonstrations, especially creative efforts that grab people's attention and make them think more deeply about what is happening, and 3) humor. Lightening up can be the most effective way to change the energy field. Being really serious and in a state of fear of what might happen feeds the energy of war.

So when we pray, it's good to remember to send love to everyone who is involved in a conflict, and that means all of the players, even those who profit from waging wars. You know these souls are some of the most needy in the world, and the most deprived of love because they are seeking substitutes such as power, control, money.

Of course, that doesn't explain all of the motivations of the players because there are truly dark, evil forces behind all of this. But these dark forces have no ability to manifest in our reality if they are not embodied as a human soul.

Every human usually has parents, siblings, children and greater family, friends, schoolmates, work colleagues... all of the people that everyone who lives in a human body experiences. the dark forces can take hold in those who, for whatever reasons, are not centered in love, and do not feel that they are loved.

Of course, there are ancestral lineages of patternings that have caused great trauma and harm, which give the dark forces a foothold within a person's psyche. However, the more people heal and follow a spiritual path which enables them to love more fully, the less likely they will be fertile ground for the dark forces to wreak havoc in our world.

My understanding of the dynamics of energy fields gives me hope for the future of humanity. The more conscious we become, the more spiritual our thoughts and actions, inevitably our paradigm shifts to care more for each other and our planet that we are part of, will result in the energy field of conflicts, violence and war dissipating and disappearing.

I keep thinking that the biblical saying that the meek will inherit the Earth is what we are on the verge of seeing today. It is the least violent of people, the most peace-loving, those with an aversion to conflict, who will ultimately prevail.

And there you have my philosophy articulated as I never have before, if not exactly in a nutshell, in several long posts here.